Spank Fail

 

Readers, Spankos, Consumers, I implore you….think before you shop.

 

 

A friend sent me this link, kind of a ‘What do you think about this’ type thing, and I sent back something along the lines of ‘Looks interesting, will investigate’.

I’m always interested in new implements, ideas, and gadgets, so I took a look at the above video advertising a small machinated spanking machine. It was disappointing. Not interested in bashing anyone’s mechanics or business here, but this spanking machine looks just pitiful for real purposes.

I’ve seen some of the larger robo-spanker machines in action and, while they at least deliver a ‘real whack’, all these gadgets leave me somewhat cold.

So there’s really nothing wrong with buying this thing – maybe you’ll even enjoy it as a strictly novelty thing – but if you have to work as hard as that poor girl in the video for your spanking then it’s probably best you just reach around there and do it yourself.

–  Dana

PS. I guess that’s really the point of this post :

Does anyone use these spanking machines? And, if so, what is the level of real enjoyment without human contact?

14 Replies to “Spank Fail”

  1. Dana,

    I think the human touch is so much better than this contraption or any other spanking machine. I have never used anything like this, and I know I never will. This machine is laughable. The woman’s bottom is not even pink, and she worked to hard for nothing. I am still laughing.

    1. Anna,

      Agreed. There are some machines on the market which are much more effective, but they still can’t give you a hug afterward.

    2. Yes, ma’am, no machine can give a big hug like a human being can after a hard spanking. There is no replacement for the top’s hug after play or discipline. A hug is worth the pain and suffering in the end (no pun intended, although hugs can be given at any time and given for no reason at all.

  2. To add to what Anna said…LOL!!!!!!!

    And the proofreader/inventor deserves a spanking with this for misspelling discreet.
    Given the choice, I would save my pennies before purchasing this “disciplinary” aide.

    1. Alexis,

      It’s almost certainly made out of the country, which would make sense given the grammar.

  3. In this month’s spanking story, the Spanker machine would not only be discret, but it would be contained with artifishul intellijence and a crule smile.

    1. BT,
      You’re right…this month’s story contest would be about the only place where this would fit right in!

  4. I gotta say I am known for my need for my spankings to be free of physical intimacy, i.e. OTK is too intimate for me, I don’t want or need to have my butt rubbed or caressed in any manner, but this is to removed even for me. Even I still have to have an emotional connection with my Tops. And that mechanical noice is distracting and not easy on the ears.

    1. AJ,
      The noise would probably bother me too. And yes, even for those who require no physical intimacy, it’s still a bit cold.

  5. This machine looks like a to, but then it’s advertised as a novelty. We have, and use, a 2nd generation RoboSpanker. Like most of the spanking machines we’ve seen, the single biggest drawback is that the bottom must be moved for even coverage. While i have seen videos of machines that vary the placement of the implement, I have never seen these variable arm models for sale anywhere leading me to believe they’re home-built. [Amazing what comes out of some people’s garage :p] To Dana’s point, the machines are somewhat boron when used solo. They’re much more fun when someone else is controlling the speed and intensity. They do make a good “other pair of hands” when there is more than one naughty bottom to be disciplined and you want to keep the other occupied while dealing with the first. Also good for supplementing when stamina or ability to grip for long periods may be an issue. They do NOT get tired.

    1. Bob,

      The RoboSpanker is a whole other level. I’ve seen that one in action personally and while there’s still a bit of maneuvering necessary, it delivers a very thorough whack.

  6. It’s so sad that people find a need for things like this. I can’t imagine that it (or any manner of self-spanking) can be anything like a punishment or even good ol’ spanking fun. But where there’s a perceived need, someone will fill it.

    As an engineer, I’m curious as to what supports the motor assembly. Is it on a stand with a 25 pound cast iron base? Seems like it would need something like that in order to keep it from slipping away from the target. On the other hand, maybe that would make a good “blooper” video like you seem to be fond of . . . . Someone setting up a spanking machine, starting it up, getting into position, and having it chase him around the room.

    Was that a rubber ruler? Got one in your tool box?

    1. Mike,

      From what I can see, it looks like the machine attaches to something by way of a skinny little metal arm…not very mechanically sound by my estimation.

      And yes, I do happen to have a rubber ruler.

  7. Dana, I do have something like this. I modified a clay pidgin thrower that can either have a cane or a riding crop attached to it. While its fun it is no where near the real thing. It is kinda boring. Sometimes you just need a spanking and there is no tall skinny brunettes around.

Leave a Reply